Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2046,   Articles in work: 318 Declined articles: 834 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

The questions of determining and preserving national identity in Siberian architecture (on the example of the Republic of Khakassia
Lemytskaya Dar'ya

PhD in Architecture

Docent, the department of Architectural Engineering, Siberian Federal University

660041, Russia, Krasnoyarskii krai, g. Krasnoyarsk, pr. Svobodnyi, 82, st.6, kab. 5-29

dar6499@yandex.ru

Abstract.

The subject of this research is the manifestation of national policy in Siberian architecture. The objects is the urban architecture of the Republic of Khakassia (on the example of the city of Abakan). Chronological boundaries of the research include the moment of establishing the Soviet regime until 1950’s. Based on studying the national policy conducted by Soviet government in the regions, the author sets the goal to determine the architectural objects with manifestation of national specificity, which are important as the objects of cultural heritage. The article meticulously reviews such aspects of the topic as the policy of indigenization in all spheres of cultural life of the Soviet society, development of national self-expression in architecture in compliance with the national policy conducted by the government. The author applies the historiographical analysis and field studies of urban development of one of the national autonomies of Russia; historical-evolutionary and comparative-typological method for analyzing the national policy pursued in USSR; interaction between national distinctness and architecture in the context of the history of architecture of the country; as well as methods of discovering the historical-cultural value of the objects. The scientific novelty consists in determination of the methods and means of reflecting national specificity of architectural objects of the national territories of USSR. It is established that the policy of indigenization was expressed in creating the objects with national specificity, using the methods of stylization and morphogenesis. The residential building in Abakan with national features is considered the most attractive and unique architectural object in the territory of Khakassia. The results of this work can be used in studying architecture of the national territories.

Keywords: heritage, historical and cultural heritage, synthesis of arts, the architecture of the USSR, national architecture, architecture, lesser town, small people, national identity, indigenization

DOI:

10.7256/2310-8673.2018.4.28041

Article was received:

01-12-2018


Review date:

16-11-2018


Publish date:

03-12-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Ethel S. Goodstein Contemporary architecture and Canadian national identity // American Review of Canadian Studies. 2009. V. 18. P. 127-159. DOI: 10.1080/02722018809480922
2.
Yasser Mahgoub Architecture and the expression of cultural identity in Kuwait // The Journal of Architecture. 2007. V. 12. 2. P. 165-182. DOI: 10.1080/13602360701363486
3.
Harpreet Mand Asia: identity, architecture and modernity // The Journal of Architecture. 2013. V. 18. 1. P. 59-78. DOI: 10.1080/13602365.2012.751801
4.
Jose M. Faraldo Medieval socialist artefacts: Architecture and discourses of national identity in provincial Poland, 1945-1960 // Nationalities Papers the Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity. 2001. V. 29. 4. P. 605-632. DOI: 10.1080/00905990120102110
5.
Askarov Sh. D. Region prostranstvo gorod. M.: Stroiizdat, 1988. 200 s.
6.
Ikonnikov A. V. Arkhitektura XX veka. Utopii i real'nost'. v 2 t. Tom 1. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2001. 655 s.
7.
Ikonnikov A. V. Arkhitektura XX veka. Utopii i real'nost'. v 2 t. Tom 2. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2002. 671 s.
8.
Ikonnikov A. V. Istorizm v arkhitekture. M.: Stroiizdat, 1997. 560 s.
9.
Yaralov Yu. S. Natsional'noe i internatsional'noe v sovetskoi arkhitekture. M.: Stroiizdat, 1971. 352 s.
10.
Astaf'eva-Dlugach M. L., Yaralov Yu. S. Samobytnost' i natsional'nye osobennosti v sovetskoi arkhitekture. M: Znanie, 1976. 48 s.
11.
Kosenkova Yu. L. Sredneaziatskii gorod glazami arkhitektorov stalinskoi epokhi // Arkhitektura stalinskoi epokhi: opyt istoricheskogo osmysleniya / Rossiiskaya akademiya arkhitektury i stroitel'nykh nauk. Nauchno-issledovatel'skii institut teorii i istorii arkhitektury i gradostroitel'stva. Sost. i otv. red. Yu. L. Kosenkova. M., 2010. S. 201-226.
12.
Khan-Magomedov S. O. Arkhitektura sovetskogo avangarda. Problemy formoobrazovaniya. Mastera i techeniya. M.: Stroiizdat, 1996. 709 s. URL: http://www.alyoshin.ru/Files/publika/khan_archi/khan_archi_1_000.html
13.
Khalitov N. Kh., Aitov R. R., Nadyrova Kh. G. Kontseptsiya podderzhki i razvitiya natsional'nogo svoeobraziya v arkhitekture Tatarstana. Kratkoe soderzhanie dokumenta // Izvestiya KGASU (Kazan'). 2012. 2 (20). S. 49-63.
14.
Iskandarov M. M. Poiski regional'noi identichnosti arkhitektury // Novyi Ural'skii stroitel'. 2012. 5 (118). URL: http://www.nus-ural.ru/archive/2012/5/423/773/
15.
Mikhailov A. Yu., Iskandarov M. M. Natsional'naya versiya sovetskogo neoklassitsizma v Kazani: problemy formulirovaniya natsional'noi arkhitektury v SSSR v 1920-1950-e gody // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2012. 6. S. 94-101. URL: https://www.academia.edu/28229817/
16.
Deklaratsiya prav narodov Rossii // Bol'shaya sovetskaya entsiklopediya / Pod red. A. M. Prokhorova. 3-e izdanie. v 30 t. Tom 8. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1972. 592 s.
17.
Lyu Syan'chzhun Plyusy i minusy politiki korenizatsii SSSR // Oikumena. 2014. 1. S. 41-49. URL: http://ojkum.ru/arc/2014_01/2014_01_05.html
18.
Sovetskie natsii i natsional'naya politika v 1920-1950-e gody // M.: Politicheskaya entsiklopediya. Fond Prezidentskii tsentr B. N. El'tsina, 2014. 686 s. URL: http://r.donnu.ru/jspui/bitstream/123456789/2229/1/istoriya%20stalinizma.pdf
19.
Bunin A., Kalmykov V. Zhilishche dlya osedayushchikh kochevnikov Kirrespubliki // Arkhitektura SSSR. 1933. 5. S. 22-27.
20.
Lemytskaya D. E. Poisk natsional'noi samoidentifikatsii v arkhitekture Khakasii (K postanovke problemy) // Arkhitekton: izvestiya vuzov. 2014. 2 (46). URL: http://archvuz.ru/2014_2/14
21.
Lemytskaya D. E., Slabukha A. V. Arkhitekturno-prostranstvennoe razvitie goroda Abakana v 19201960 gody // Arkhitekton: izvestiya vuzov. 2012. 1 (37). URL: http://archvuz.ru/2012_1/17
22.
Slabukha A. V. Ustanovlenie istoriko-kul'turnoi tsennosti ob''ektov arkhitekturnogo naslediya (chast' 1): organizatsionno-metodicheskie problemy // Chelovek i kul'tura. 2016. 6. S. 1-8. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8744.2016.6.20712. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/ca/article_20712.html
23.
Slabukha A. V. Ustanovlenie istoriko-kul'turnoi tsennosti ob''ektov arkhitekturnogo naslediya (chast' 2): kriterii i metod v sovremennoi ekspertnoi praktike // Chelovek i kul'tura. 2016. 6. S. 9-22. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8744.2016.6.20767. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/ca/article_20767.html