Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2075,   Articles in work: 296 Declined articles: 803 
Library

Back to contents

International relations
Reference:

International Status of Post-Soviet Countries: Traditional and Relational Approaches to Hierarchy Assessment
Degterev Denis Andreevich

PhD in Economics

Head of the department, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia; Docent, the department of Theory and History of International relations; the department of World Economy; Moscow State Institute of International Relations

117198, Russia, Moscow, Mikluho-Maklaya Street 10/2, office #301

degterev@mgimo.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Butorov Aleksei Sergeevich

PhD in History

post-graduate student of the Department of the Theory and History of International Relations at Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

117198, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Miklukho-Maklaya, 6

butorov-as@rudn.ru

Abstract.

This article is devoted to the analysis of the status of countries of the post-Soviet space in the system of international relations, studied in the framework of the traditional approach (in the context of the neorealist paradigm of the TMO) and relational (in the context of the constructivist paradigm). The article has applied the quantitative methods of analysis of the international potential of the post-Soviet countries, developed in the framework of the information-analytical system "Eurasia Index". These techniques allowed the operationalization of the main approaches to the assessment of international status and make a comparative analysis between the two approaches. For the traditional assessment of the aggregate potential of the countries of the post-Soviet space, the additive composite index of the national potential of D. Singer (the project "Correlators of War") and the Global Firepower Index are used. Within the framework of the relational approach, a network of embassies of foreign countries accredited in the countries of the former Soviet Union is analyzed, as well as a network of embassies of the countries of the former Soviet Union abroad. The findings allow to clarify the existing ideas about the international hierarchy that has developed in the framework of the post-Soviet subsystem of international relations. Of particular interest is the analysis of the dynamics, as well as the identification of discrepancies between the two methods of calculation, traditional (resource-based) and relational that is based on the international recognition of the country and the network of its diplomatic missions.

Keywords: relational approach, national power, constructivism, quantitative analysis, international status, CIS, Post-Soviet space, network analysis, hierarchy, Eurasia Index

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0641.2018.4.28233

Article was received:

10-12-2018


Review date:

05-12-2018


Publish date:

11-12-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Vneshnyaya politika stran SNG. Pod red. D.A.Degtereva, K.P.Kuryleva. M.: Aspekt Press, 2017. 496 s.
2.
Degterev D.A. Kolichestvennye metody v mezhdunarodnykh issledovaniyakh // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2015. T. 13. № 2 (41). S. 35-54.
3.
Degterev D.A. Setevoi analiz mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2015. № 4. S. 119-138.
4.
Degterev D.A., Vasilyuk I.P., Baum V.V. Parametry mnogovektornosti vneshnei politiki stran SNG: prikladnoi analiz // Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2018. tom 62. № 1. S. 63–75.
5.
Degterev D.A., Degterev A.Kh., Nikulin M.A., Oganesen A.L. Prikladnoi analiz vneshnei politiki stran SNG// Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2014. № 4. S. 176-184.
6.
Degterev D.A., Khudaikulova A.V. Balans sil v mezhdunarodno-politicheskoi nauke: teoreticheskie kontseptsii i prikladnoi analiz // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. 2018. № 1. S. 1-12.
7.
Zinchenko A.V. Status Rossii v ierarkhii sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18: Sotsiologiya i politologiya. 2009. № 3. S. 21-26.
8.
Kurylev K.P., Galoyan N.G., Stanis D.V., Bredikhin A.V. Soblyudenie balansa sil na Yuzhnom Kavkaze // Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2018. № 3. S. 108-118
9.
Kurylev K.P., Degterev D.A., Stanis D.V., Smolik N.G. Kolichestvennyi analiz fenomena geopoliticheskogo plyuralizma postsovetskogo prostranstva // Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii. 2018. № 1. C.134-156.
10.
Metamorfozy mirovoi politiki. Pod red. M.M.Lebedevoi. M.: MGIMO, 2012.
11.
Portyakov V.Ya. Eshche odin god povysheniya mezhdunarodnogo statusa Kitaya // Aziya i Afrika segodnya. 2010. № 10. S. 75-77.
12.
Rtskhiladze G.V. Faktor vneshnego avtoriteta dlya «malykh» gosudarstv i integratsiya na postsovetskom prostranstve // Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2018. № 1. S. 33-48.
13.
Khudaikulova A.V. Sovremennye mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya: implikatsiya novogo konteksta vzaimozavisimosti // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2005. № 6. S. 172-176.
14.
Abbott A. Things of Boundaries // Social Research. 1995. 62 (04). P. 857–882.
15.
Aglyan V.R. Dimensions of International Hierarchy in the Post-Soviet Space: Analytical Approaches and Empirical Reflections // Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2014. № 4. S. 185-192.
16.
Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality. Ed. by Lamont M., Fournier M. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
17.
Duque M. Recognizing International Status: A Relational Approach // International Studies Quarterly. 2018. 62 (3). P. 577–592.
18.
Kharkevich M. The Critical Experience of Russia in Global Governance // Russian Politics & Law. 2016. 54 (5-6). P. 461-476.
19.
Lebow R. A Cultural Theory of International Relations. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
20.
Major Powers and the Quest for Status in International Politics: Global and Regional Perspectives. Ed. by T.J. Volgy, R. Corbetta, K.A. Grant, R. G. Baird. N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
21.
Miller J., Cramer J., Volgy T., Bezerra P., Hauser M., Sciabarra Ch. Norms, Behavioral Compliance, and Status Attribution in International Politics // International Interactions. 2015. 41 (05). P.779–804.
22.
Singer, D. Reconstructing the Correlates of War Dataset on Material Capabilities of States, 1816-1985 // International Interactions. 1988. 14 (02). P. 115-132.
23.
Status in World Politics. Ed. by T. V. Paul, D.W. Larson and W. C. Wohlforth. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
24.
Troitskiy M. Power, Status, and Entanglement: Russia’s Evolving Approach to Multilateral Institutions // Russian Politics & Law. 2016. 54 (5-6). P. 415-420.
25.
Wallace M. Power, Status, and International War // Journal of Peace Research. 1971. 8 (1). P. 23–35.
26.
Wohlforth W. Unipolarity, Status Competition, and Great Power War // World Politics. 2009. 61 (01). P. 28–57