State institutions and legal systems
Kravets I. —
Global and national constitutionalism in the context of formation of integration law: constitutional teleology, futurism and structure of modern constitutions
// Law and Politics.
– 2019. – ¹ 10.
– P. 1 - 23.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2019.10.27293 URL: https://en. nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=27293
Read the article
This article examines the scientific approaches towards understanding constitutionalism in the global, integration, and national dimension; as well as the role of constitutional teleology in creating conceptual and regulatory framework of the national and global constitutionalism in the context of formation of integration law. The study determines the forms of interaction between the Russian constitutionalism and integration law, and their reflection in the Constitution of the Russian Federation. The author rationalizes the modern approaches towards understanding and terminological definition of constitution as the ultimate and supreme law of the country, regulating the domestic and international integration relations. The scientific views upon the key elements of constitutional law from the perspective of internationalization processes are revealed. The scientific novelty of this work consists in description of the theoretical framework of correlation between the global and national constitutionalism, Russian specificity of legal nature of constitutionalism, analysis of theological foundations of the formation of constitutional communication and constitutional identity, formulation of the concept of constitutional law from the perspective of Russia’s involvement in the integration and international relations. The article reflects the problem of internationalization of constitutional law and the problem of open structure of the constitution. The author suggests new forms for Russia’s participation in formation of the doctrine and practice of global constitutionalism, considering the challenges of integration processes in creation of the regulatory and structural framework of the Russian constitutionalism as an open system.
constitutional political participation, the law of the constitution, constitutional communication, global constitutionalism, constitutional teleology, integration through the law, constitutionalism, constitution, constitutional identity, constitutional crowdsourcing
Teubner G. Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. 275 p.
Bondar' N.S. Sudebnyy konstitutsionalizm: postanovka problemy v kontekste roli Konstitutsionnogo Suda v utverzhdenii «zhivogo» rossiyskogo konstitutsionalizma // Lex Russica. 2009. T. 68. ¹ 2. S. 322-343.
Kravets I.A. Printsipy rossiyskogo konstitutsionalizma i konstitutsionalizatsiya pravovogo poryadka: monografiya / I.A. Kravets. Moskva: RUSAYNS, 2017. 336 s.
Bartole S. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe pravo – nezamenimyy instrument dlya sozdaniya transnatsional'nogo prava // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. 2018. ¹ 1 (68). S. 39–46.
Smirnova E.S. Konstitutsionnaya globalistika: mif ili real'nost'? //Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2012. ¹ 4. S. 2–8.
Moiseev A.A. Suverenitet gosudarstva v mezhdunarodnom prave: uchebnoe posobie. M.: Vostok – Zapad, 2009. 384 s.
Umnova (Konyukhova) I.A. Konstitutsionnoe razvitie: k voprosu o predelakh v kontekste doktr
Question at hand
Baksalova A. —
Legal regulation of the system of prosecutor’s response to violation of law by the bodies of inquiry and preliminary investigation
// Law and Politics.
– 2019. – ¹ 10.
– P. 24 - 31.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2019.10.30983 URL: https://en. nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=30983
Read the article
This article explores the problems associated with the prosecutor’s response to violation of law committed by the bodies of inquiry and preliminary investigation in pretrial investigation of a criminal case. The conclusion is made on impossibility of introducing the prosecutor’s requirements on elimination of such violations prior to initiation of criminal investigation. The analysis of legislation demonstrates that such act of prosecutorial supervision as representation on prevention of legal violation cannot be applied in the criminal procedural sphere, although it is frequently applied in practice as demonstrated by the statistics. The author draws the conclusion on introducing certain amendments to the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, as well as to the Federal Law “On the Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation”. It is suggested to exclude the requirement on prevention of legal violations, replacing it with the more universal concept, which in terms of its consolidation in the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation can be put forth not only in a specific criminal case, but also serve other purposes: elimination of causes and conditions contributing to violation of law, bringing to justice the official violating the law, elimination of the group of violations of procedural law, determined by the prosecutor in various cases.
acts of prosecutorial response, the Prosecutor's response, pre-trial proceedings, bodies of preliminary investigation, prosecutorial supervision, prosecutor, criminal proceeding, criminal case, criminal trial, Prosecutor's request
Spirin A. V. Predstavlenie prokurora ob ustranenii narusheniy ugolovno-protsessual'nogo zakona v dosudebnom proizvodstve // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve. 2014. ¹ 5. S. 211-215.
Vil'de L. V. Slozhnosti realizatsii nadzornoy funktsii prokurora na dosudebnoy stadii proizvodstva po delu // Ugolovnyy protsess. 2012. ¹ 3. S. 32-34.
Voronin O. V. O sovremennom soderzhanii prokurorskogo nadzora // Vestn. Tom. gos. un-ta. Pravo. 2012. ¹ 4 (6). S. 14-25.
Vinokurov A. Yu. K voprosu o klassifikatsii nadzornykh polnomochiy prokurora // Problemy ukrepleniya zakonnosti i pravoporyadka: nauka, praktika, tendentsii. 2010. ¹ 3. S. 274-281.
Ergashev E. R. O sovremennykh problemakh prokurorskogo nadzora za ispolneniem zakonov organami, osushchestvlyayushchimi predvaritel'noe sledstvie // Elektronnoe prilozhenie k «Rossiyskomu yuridicheskomu zhurnalu». 2015. ¹ 6. S. 35-42.
Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti otdel'nykh polozheniy statey 7, 15, 107, 234 i 450 Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s zaprosom grupp